India is the largest democracy in the world. I am experiencing the democratic form of government more than 27 years and I find that this is not a good form of government. I agree the representative form of government but not the democracy that the Indian is following. Citizen of Indian elected their representative but did they really represent the people is a big question. In India some candidate were elected without any ideas of Law and Governance, they don’t even know what is written in the constitution and how to govern the state according to the law of the land. The state remember their citizen only in the times of election and in the election the richest candidate and powerful person always win the election and at last the state become the enemies of the citizen. There is no test system or courses for the candidate whether the candidate can hold the highest ministerial post or nor but they were just elected because they have power and they were the only candidate and the 90% of candidate come from political families back ground in India. Politician sons, daughters, and grand children can involved in politics any times they like Mr.Kiren Rijiju and Mr. Rahul Gandhi, did. The nominal representative run the government and in return their policies harmful to some communities and denied all their right for the interest of the larger group which is one of the worst part of the democracy. Some month back in my home town, state forces killed two protester by live bullets and 56 seriously injure and more than 100 have minor injuries. The protest started when the ruling government trying to create a problem by imposing 144 CrPC to get people attention; the politician do anything to get power and in order to get power they need people attention, in order to get people attention, they create unnecessary a problem and act like a movies heroes. In present form of government the concept is that, majority is always right because in majority there is power but I rather find the truth instead of following to the injustices ideologies because according to me ‘power and right’ are two face of the coin. The person can earn power by doing right thing according their interest and capabilities but over rides the constitution at dark Corner to get power is not the Right. When we recall the incident of last September 2014 in Ukhrul, how the state take a u-turn politic, we elected them to rule in our interest and law of the land but in return they came with a gun unlawfully like a machine out of control, at that time we can’t re-act to state forces directly but we fight them with constitution. However the constitution empower them to kills us anytime, she said do whatever you think is right we will covers you up; so the forces kills two innocent civilians and wounded many, as a cover up team the state compensated 5 lacks to the bereaves, which is a highly questionable. Manipur Government and Center Government Policies is harmful for Tangkhul Naga, Killing to the Civilian and paying for compensations is the policy for foolish Manipur CM Ibobi Singh and HM Gaikhangam, why GoM imposed Sec 144 CrPC under Arm Force Special Power Act (AFSPA) where the army have powers to take any citizen lives they likes without trails, there is no law under AFPSA but actually in the constitution it is given that if they captures any suspected person they should hand-over to the nearest police station, imposing such an unnecessary law in our Home Town? The state claim that 144CrPC is imposed because one citizen is killed by identified person, who kills Ngaranzar? The Tangkhul community or nscn or Manipur Govt? When don’t they imposed in the places where he got killed, why not in Imphal? Why not in other places but in Ukhrul Town Alone? why the govt giving trouble to the civil for no reason? He was kills directly or Indirectly by the GoM or his personnel enemies in my opinion. And this is the policies play by the center govt using to GoM. According to my understanding Sec 144 CrPC is firstly use in England in 18-19 century but they abolish by the Public Order Act 1986.The section was used for the first time in 1861 by the British Raj, Firstly, According to sections 141-149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), It is use only when there is emergency like; riot, communal riot, they(protesters) can be sent to ‘the jail for 3 years or fine’ in Indian constitutional context. Secondly, Right to protest or rally is given in the Indian constitution, when govt act against the will of the community. Thirdly, when there is protest, the securities forces can use tear gas, even the rubber bullet is not permitted until they were asked to do so and securities forces were not given authority to use live bullet, but only in one condition they can fires to the protesters; only when the protesters is out of control, at that time they can five warning to the protester by blind fire, and if the situation is out of control then they can shot in the foot or below thigh, and when the some protester down then the forces should take them to the nearest hospital at the earliest. However the Indian soldier never follow the constitution of India. I read thoroughly the constitution of Indian and i find that it is not mention to kills the protesters in the Indian constitution and i realized the danger of democratic form of government because, they were elected by the people where these representative misused the law of the land and can not read the constitution of the nation, even they know what is written out there but they easily won the election by manipulating to the common people by using vote bank politic and money power. They know nothing about Human Right and Indian Constitution. Fourthly, why did the GoM violate the constitution of India, Why Manipur Govt become the enemies for the common citizens and where is RN Ravi in this time? No! he cant hide behind the screen. And lastly but not the least, polices and IRBs(GoM) are 100% wrong by killing innocent protesters or killing without trail, based on International law, Indian constitution and Tangkhul Customary Law; the guilty should be penalized according the law of the land. Here is your further clarification, they are not in riots but they are the protesters. So, Indian democracies is not the best form of government and this can’t applied in Nagas inhabited areas.